Developers are dissatisfied with the principles of Apple approved apps for iPhone

The public is watching with interest to see how events unfold, relating to the application approval process for iPhone at Apple. Many sites pay attention to and write about her problem, and 9to5 Mac and TechCrunch - not an exception. The thing is that about six weeks ago from Facebook developer Joe Hewitt (Joe Hewitt) sent to approval in the App Store a new version of the application Facebook 3.0, while Apple's has not received any news this score.

The other day in the hearts of Hewitt wrote in a blog post in which Apple calls altogether abandon this senseless application evaluation process. According to him, the company's attempts to protect their devices and their users from malicious programs, of course, somewhat justified, but there is one "but." The entire World Wide Web has been working (and very successfully) and without having to sterilize every application or software, and then transfer it to users. So Apple could trust the developers and, instead, to spend time the whole team on the inspection of each proposed application, easy to control the work of App Store. It's very simple and quite logical: the users themselves are able to select which applications to their smartphones are good and which are not. And if some developer offers something harmful or useless for download, the user will inform about it, and in the App Store to access it simply will be closed. Also works Google, checking application created for Android. Although Android is not as popular as the iPhone, Apple management could well take a cue from Google and somehow rationalize holding his staff working hours.