Should I switch to Chrome OS? No question - Google itself do everything for you

Visibility across Google take into account the principle of the mountains and Magomed against the background of extremely sluggish spread their Interactive desktop, Chrome OS their steps to merge the browser the operating system and operating system look quite meaningful. Why try to transplant the users favorite browser to "inferior axis" if you can gently turn your favorite browser in this same axle, making them one and the same?

Latest build of the 29th beta Google Chrome received a separate and visible icon "Applications" on the bookmark bar (install the beta of Chrome browser, you can always here).

Many of you probably already appreciate the charm of the offline mail, Google Docs, and other things from the Chrome Web Store, and now the company is clearly and strongly pushes these tools. In fact, these same applications for Chrome and are the main power of Chrome OS (we recall that a universal app, that is suitable for both Chrome browser and Chrome OS). In such a situation how would Google unobtrusively invites all users to explore the opportunities provided by the browser. And so it is with this and start unconscious, but it is quite soft and completely painless migration from the Chrome browser in the Chrome OS.

It is impossible not to notice, and the changes in the interface of a new Chrome tab. Now find and frequently visited pages, and friends sit on the same page and in the right corner we again meet those same applications.

Previously, we published an article, a question under the name "Are you ready for the computer, which only has Chrome?"And as part of this material is described in some detail the advantages, disadvantages and possibilities of Google's OSes.

There's also been given answers to the most pressing questions: where to get analogues currently used Windows-based applications and whether it is possible to work with Chrome OS Offline.

Now, however, it becomes clear that not migrate anywhere you need - Google apparently "glues" your browser and operating system, turning them into a single product, which remains the user's favorite and is very effective in daily tasks, but at the same time more and more cluttered with new chips that are characteristic full OS.

What do we lack? Probably left gash in his default and clearly perceivable analogue window file browser (that is, to implement convenient access to the browser computer file system), and also give the user the ability to run a certain Chrome shell or hard as the main system, a substituent customary Windows.

Tell me, do you like this Chrome evolution?