When in the summer in the iPhone has been added to the video function, the elite of the computer industry has come to the conclusion that this change marked the end of a line of inexpensive video cameras from Cisco - Flip. Now, Apple has integrated camera and a tiny player in the iPod nano, which can clog the final nail in the coffin of competing products.
However, workers NewTeeVee site conducted a comparative analysis of these two gadgets, and concluded that the picture is exhibited by Flip, quality than the one that offers iPod nano.
But do not believe that the difference in the quality of videos recorded by both devices is significant, and that better quality video would save Flip from extinction. (After all, if the user is really interested in the quality of recorded video, it does not use the Flip at all.) But if you think about choosing between a camera and a camera, which allows you to also listen to music, watch movies and play games…. The answer seems obvious. And in this case, Cisco is unlikely to help an expensive advertising.
As for Apple's, the player has passed its test quality under the name of "good enough" conducted one of AllThinhsD reviewers. Of course, nano does not offer this quality of video as a special device, but for the general user needs, work satisfactory player.
Assess the quality of the video you can in this comparison video (readers of Google Reader, you may need to go to Macradar site):